HomepagePresidential Center of DPA hosted a discussion on the evolution of Kazakhstan's presidential inst...

Presidential Center of DPA hosted a discussion on the evolution of Kazakhstan's presidential institution

Presidential Center of DPA hosted a discussion on the evolution of Kazakhstan's presidential institution Presidential Center of DPA hosted a discussion on the evolution of Kazakhstan's presidential institution Presidential Center of DPA hosted a discussion on the evolution of Kazakhstan's presidential institution Presidential Center of DPA hosted a discussion on the evolution of Kazakhstan's presidential institution Presidential Center of DPA hosted a discussion on the evolution of Kazakhstan's presidential institution

A round table discussion titled "The institution of the presidency is a factor of political stability and pillar of statehood" was held at the Presidential Center of the Department of Presidential Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the eve of the day the institution was established in Kazakhstan.

The event was organized to address topical issues of the genesis of the institution of the presidency, its legal nature and place in the system of public authorities, as well as to discuss trends in transformation and the main results of its functioning.

​As Bakytzhan Temirbolat, Director of the Presidential Center, emphasized in his welcoming remarks, each stage of development of the institution of the presidency in Kazakhstan was a response to the strategic challenges facing the nation in each specific historical period. The modern stage is associated with the constitutional reform of 2022, which created a new foundation for the political reset of the country. The decentralization measures taken, through the redistribution of powers from the President to the legislative, executive and judicial branches, have defined a new format for the place and role of the institution of the presidency in society. The country has moved to the model of a presidential republic with a strong Parliament.

According to Askar Nursha, Deputy Director of the Kazakhstan Institute for Strategic Studies under the President of Kazakhstan, we have moved away from the super-presidential form of government and are now moving towards the concept of "the President as a hired manager". Experts and scientists researching Kazakhstan's presidential system must first understand our cultural code and consider how customs, society, and history have shaped these and other political transformations.

The primary objective of the present radical changes, according to Berik Bekzhanov, Deputy Director of the Institute of Parliamentarism, is to enhance the involvement of civil society in the public decision-making process. However, the strengthening of rights implies an increase in responsibility. In this regard, the successful development of the institution of the presidency is impossible without every official, each member of society to take full responsibility for the future of the country.   

During the round table presentations were also given by the chief researcher of the Institute of State History, Doctor of Political Sciences ZhapsarbaiKuanyshev, head of the Center for International Programs of Nursultan Nazarbayev Foundation ZiyadaZhanataeva, associate professor of the Kazakhstan branch of Lomonosov Moscow State University, candidate of historical sciences Sagintai Berdagulova.

 

For reference: Historically, the fate of presidential power in Kazakhstan, its origins and further development are associated with the Law of the Kazakh SSR from April 24, 1990 "On the establishment of the post of President of the Kazakh SSR and the introduction of amendments and additions to the Constitution (Basic Law of the Kazakh SSR).​

Establishment of the post of the President of the Kazakh SSR was the most important event that had a decisive influence on the formation of the political system of the independent state and ensured the continuity of state power.

In Kazakhstan, the evolution of presidential power became the driving force of the country's forced development. The logic of its transformation at each stage was objectively necessary and allowed to overcome the challenges and threats to the independent state.